Oxman vom Anwaltsamt suspendiert

Na endlich!!!

Oxman suspendiert von der Ausführung des antwaltlichen Amtes für 2 Jahre: 3 Jahre auf Bewährung, davon 2 Jahre Verbot der Berufsausübung
Kompetenzen müssen nach 2 Jahren wieder unter Beweis gestellt werden.

Die Gründe (siehe PDF) sind vielfälig: Missachtung der richterlichen Anordnung, Nichtbeachtung der gerichtlichen Sanktionen, Vermischung von pers. Fonds mit Kliententreuhandkontos, moralische Verworfenheit, Unehrlichkeit, mangelnde Zusammenarbeit/Verschuldung

Oxman is suspended for 2 years :
It is recommended that RICKEY BRIAN OXMAN, member no. 72172, be suspended
from the practice of law for three years; that execution of that suspension be stayed; and that Respondent be placed on probation for three years, with the following conditions:

1. Respondent must be actually suspended from the practice of law for the first two years of probation and until he provides proof to the satisfaction of the State Bar Court of his rehabilitation, present fitness to practice, and present learning and ability in the general law pursuant to standard 1.4(c)(ii).

2. Respondent must comply with the provisions of the State Bar Act, the Rules of
Professional Conduct, and all the conditions of this probation.

3. Respondent must maintain, with the State Bar‟s Membership Records Office and the
State Bar‟s Office of Probation, his current office address and telephone number or, if no
office is maintained, an address to be used for State Bar purposes. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §
6002.1, subd. (a).) Respondent must also maintain, with the State Bar‟s Membership
Records Office and the State Bar‟s Office of Probation, his current home address and
telephone number. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6002.1, subd. (a)(5).) Respondent‟s home
address and telephone number will not be made available to the general public. (Bus. &
Prof. Code, § 6002.1, subd. (d).) Respondent must notify the Membership Records
Office and the Office of Probation of any change in any of this information no later than
10 days after the change.

4. Respondent must report, in writing, to the State Bar‟s Office of Probation no later than
January 10, April 10, July 10 and October 10 of each year, or part thereof, in which
Respondent is on probation (reporting dates). However, if Respondent‟s probation
begins less than 30 days before a reporting date, Respondent may submit the first report
no later than the second reporting date after the beginning of his probation. In each
report, Respondent must state that it covers the preceding calendar quarter or applicable
portion thereof and certify by affidavit or under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California as follows:
(a) in the first report, whether Respondent has complied with all the provisions of
the State Bar Act, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and all other conditions of
probation since the beginning of probation; and
(b) in each subsequent report, whether Respondent has complied with all the
provisions of the State Bar Act, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and all other
conditions of probation during that period.

During the last 20 days of this probation, Respondent must submit a final report covering
any period of probation remaining after and not covered by the last quarterly report
required under this probation condition. In this final report, Respondent must certify to
the matters set forth in subparagraph (b) of this probation condition by affidavit or under
penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California.

5. Subject to the proper or good faith assertion of any applicable privilege, Respondent must fully, promptly, and truthfully answer any inquiries of the State Bar‟s Office of Probation that are directed to Respondent, whether orally or in writing, relating to whether
Respondent is complying or has complied with the conditions of this probation.
-
6. Within one year after the effective date of the Supreme Court order in this matter,
Respondent must attend and satisfactorily complete the State Bar‟s Ethics School and the
State Bar‟s Client Trust Accounting School and provide satisfactory proof of such
completion to the State Bar‟s Office of Probation. This condition of probation is separate
and apart from Respondent‟s California Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE)
requirements; accordingly, Respondent Oxman is ordered not to claim any MCLE credit
for attending and completing this course. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, rule 3201.)

7. Respondent‟s probation will commence on the effective date of the Supreme Court order imposing discipline in this matter.

http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/07-O-11968-3.pdf

BRAVO. Wenn das das Fazit seiner Karriere ist, dann muss sich dieser Schwätzer aber schon einiges geleistet haben.
Wenigstens gibt es von ihm keine ungewünschten und unqualifizierten Äußerungen mehr zu MJ.

Amidala