Estate-Management-Bericht

  • Stelle das mal hierzu ein. Aussagen von Kathrines Anwalt Sanders in einem aktuellen AP-Artikel:
    http://www.boston.com/entertai…DPbyRwgRC5PTMK/story.html


    “This is a complex estate with unique issues,” said Katherine’s attorney, Perry Sanders Jr. “Under all the circumstances, Mrs. Jackson and the children are certainly being well cared for.”

    "Dies ist ein komplexer Estate mit einzigartigen Themen", sagte Katherine Anwalt Perry Sanders Jr. "Unter allen Umständen wird für Frau Jackson, und die Kinder sicherlich gut gesorgt."


    Sanders, who has conducted audits of the estate’s spending, said everything is in order and detailed financial records match precisely what has been presented in court.
    Sanders, der Prüfungen der Ausgaben des Anwesens durchgeführt hat, sagte alles ist in Ordnung ist und die detaillierten Finanzdaten entsprechen genau dem was bei Gericht vorgelegt worden ist.



    Source: AP | miami.cbslocal.com

  • Kathrine hat Antrag gestellt, dass der Estate die Kosten für das Berufungsverfahren gegen AEG übernimmt, 20000 Dollar Honar und zus. 100000 Dollar Erfolgshonorar wenn Berufungsantrag erfolgreich ist (die Kosten vom AEG-Prozess, rund 90000 Dollar werden erst fällig wenn Berufungsantrag abgeschlossen ist.). Richter möchte offensichtlich eine Klärung inwieweit die Übernahme der Kosten Angelegenheit des Estates ist.
    Kathrine hat zudem eine 24% Erhöhung für die Kinder und eine 23% Erhöhung für sich bzgl.der monatlichen Unterhaltszahlungen beantragt. Estate hatte wohl zugestimmt und benötigt dazu nur die Zustimmung der Anwältin der Kinder und Attorney General (der Charity.Intressen vertritt). Die Anwältin der Kinder hat allerdings ihre Bedenken geäußert und möchte das der Estate eine gerichtliche Prüfung erfragt.



    ALLOWANCE OF FEES


    Petitioner(s): Jackson, Katherine Esther


    Attorney(s):


    Continuance Number: Continuance From:


    Last Date Changed: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 03:43 PM



    petn filed 7/9/14


    SUMMARY:
    petnr is co-guardian
    ntc ok
    spcl ntc/copy (AG) ok


    FACTS: Petnr is co-guardian, seeking the court to instruct the Executors to pay atty fees incurred by petnr individually and as guardian. Petnr and the minor children are bens of this estate.


    On 9/15/10, petnr, individually and on behalf of the decd's 3 minor children, filed a wrongful death suit agst AEG Live (BC 445597). A verdict was entered in favor of AEG Live. On 1/22/14, petnr filed an appeal, retaining the firm of Reed Smith LLP to handle 2 consolidated appeals (B252411 and B251972)


    In April 2014, petnr and the minors were ordered to pay costs of 854,820.16 to AEG Live. On 5/27/14, Reed Smith filed Appellants' Opening Brief, Appendix, and the Certified Reporters' Transcripts. Reed Smith agreed to forego its typical hourly rate and agreed to a fee cap of 200,000 for the work on Appeal, plus a 100,000 success bonus if a reversal of the judgment was attained. There is an additional amt of 9,500 for costs. Petnr will provide a copy of the retainer agreement for in camera review. Atty rates are 340/hr - 830/hr.


    Pursuant to PC 2642(b) & (c), petnr requests that the court instruct the Executors to pay Reed Smith a maximum of 300,000 from the Estate, for legal services relating to the Appeal on behalf of petnr and the minor children, plus costs 9,500.


    Per decl of appellate atty, issues raised on appeal are numerous and complex, as the appeal challenges the trial cout's summary adjudication rulings and certain rulings during trial. Atty has reviewed trial court file, inc 17,700 page reporter's transcript, extensive legal research, prep and filing of opening brief and 16 volume appendix. A Reply brief will be due 50 days after the Respondent's Brief is filed.


    MATTERS TO CLEAR:
    A. Petnr alleg she is proceeding under PC 2642(b) & (c). There is no PC 2642(c). Moreover, this section permits ATTORNEYS to bring a petition fixing fees. Appears any such petition fixing fees related to the guardianship should be brought in the guardianship hearing. And petnr, as an indvidual adult, can incur fees without any court order fixing them. How is PC 2642(c) applicable to this petn, brought in this decd's estate proceeding by the guardian, and by an estate bene in her individual capacity? supp reqd.
    B. Under what authority is this estate liable for the atty fees of petnr, individually, and as guardian of the minors? Is petnr actually seeking a preliminary dist to beneficiaries pay atty fees? If so, in what proportion should this amount be charged to the share of each beneficiary? are all equal benes? supp reqd.
    C. If this is really a petn for prelim dist, appears a separate petn must be brought in the gship estate to determine if this is an appropriate expenditure of guardianship funds (as to the share attributable to the minor benes only). supp reqd.
    D. When is this payment to be made, since the 100,000 is due only upon successful appellate outcome? Is the other 200,000 to be paid up front, or as incurred? Who is responsibility is it to review the bills for accuracy - petnr or extrs? supp reqd.
    E. No copy of retainer agreement - petnr alleg it will be provided for in camera review. o/w, if court will not allow in camera review, to be filed w/ supp.
    F. Who are the tees of the irrev life insurance tr? ntc? o/w, what authority to request relief as to Irrev Life Ins tr in this estate proceeding? supp reqd.


    RELIEF:
    1. JTD instruct and order the executors of the Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson OR the trustees of the Irrev Life Insurance Trust, to pay counsel for the benes, Reed Smith LLP's attorney fees and costs not to exceed the sum of 300,000, for legal services rendered w/ respect to the Appeal, as well as related costs NTE 9,500 - COMMENT: No authority to direct tees of Irrev Life Ins Tr in this decd's estate proceeding. If any order is made, it can be as to the executors only


    P/A COMMENT: see notes. What authority for this estate to pay the attorney fees incurred on behalf of the beneficiaries individually? The code section cited in petn (PC 2642(b)& (c) does not appear to be applicable in this proceeding. If this is a really a petn for prelim dist, then it appears the court in the guardianship proceeding must determine if this is a proper expenditure of funds due to the guardianship. O/w, if this is really some sort of petition for instructions that petnr has authority for, then court may consider in camera review of retainer agreement. o/w, copy of retainer agreement to be filed w/ supp.


    Fortsetzung im nächsten Post:

  • Zusammenfassung siehe Vorpost:


    RELATED ITEMS: 1002-1005


    Order to be Prepared By Clerk: Attorney:


    --------------------------------


    BP117321 1002 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
    Letters of Administr
    FAMILY ALLOWANCE


    Petitioner(s): Branca, John McClain, John


    Attorney(s): Hoffman, Paul Gordon, Esq.


    Continuance Number: Continuance From:


    Last Date Changed: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 03:44 PM


    PETN FILED 7/09/14 (RECADTED--FILED CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL SUBJECT TO MOTION TO SEAL FILED SEPARATELY ON 7/09/14)


    PRIOR ORDERS:


    SUMMARY:
    Petnrs are pers reps
    Spec ltrs 7/14/09; gen ltrs 11/12/09 (limited IAEA)
    D/D 6/25/09
    Ntc/copy guardians of person, GAL ok
    Ntc/copy Katherine Jackson's atty ok
    Ntc/copy spec ntc, including AG ok
    Dec of Sandra L. Ribera (atty for Katherine Jackson) filed 7/09/14 (redacted)


    FACTS: Decd was survived by his three minor children (Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr., Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson, and Prince Michael Jackson II). Decd's mother, Katherine Esther Jackson ("Mrs. Jackson"), is the Guardian of the Person of the Minor Children. Margaret G. Lodise is the GAL for the Minor Children. The sole bene of decd's estate is his inter vivos trust. Petnrs are the Co-Trustees of the Trust. The tr benes are the Minor Children, Mrs. Jackson and unnamed charities.


    Petnrs allege decd provided sole financial support for the Minor Children & was Mrs. Jackson's primary source of support. Per 8/03/09 order, petnrs were authorized and directed to pay from funds of the estate a family allowance for the benefit of Mrs. Jackson & the Minor Children, retroactive to 6/25/09 (d/d). Since that time, petnrs have adjusted the allowance per their IAEA & per Crt's orders. Petnrs allege Mrs. Jackson seeks an increase. GAL has requested petnrs seek an order re the increase. The requested amt includes estimated amounts allowed for income taxes, the Minor Children's travel and tuition, which amounts are not paid out monthly, but rather, are held by the petnrs and expended from time to time as needed.


    In addition to the family allowance, petnrs provide and will continue to provide other funds for the support of the Minor Children and Mrs. Jackson, as follows: expenses, including pay off of the mortgage, substantial repairs and improvements, associated w/Havenhurst r/p in Encino, where Mrs. Jackson resided for more than thirty years; expenses associated w/"Alternative Residence," where Mrs. Jackson & the Minor Children resided during renovation of the Havenhurst r/p & where they continue to reside; medical treatment not covered by the family allowance.


    Per atty Ribera's dec, the Minor Children are seeking an allowance increase of 24% from the current allowance; and Mrs. Jackson is seeking an increase of 23%; current allowance went into effect on 01/01/12. Breakdown attached to dec. Dec addresses areas of Mrs. Jackson's proposed increase in which the GAL expressed concern. Categories of children's allowance include: salaries and payroll benefits (nannies; chef; bodyguards; payroll taxes; worker's comp ins; med ins); basis needs (food, clothing, personal grooming, personal supplies); med exp (health ins; doctors/dentists/vision); school tuition/activities (annual donations, uniforms, books, computers, supplies, field trip, extracurricular activities, acting, guitar, karate, stop motion, tutoring); entertainment, travel & other expenses (entertainment, travel, toys/ games/ holidays/ parties/ electronics; pet care; gas & maint of security vehicles; hobbies; upgrades to Prince's car/maint, furniture); taxes (income tax; professional svc, CPA, bookkeeper). Categories of Mrs. Jackson's allowance: salaries and payroll benefits (salary, driver; handyman & full-time housekeeper; parttime housekeeper; payroll taxes; worker's comp ins); med benefits (ins); contract workers; basis needs (food, clothing, personal grooming, personal supplies; health ins; doctors, dentist, vision); entertainment, travel & other (gas, maint of vehicle & RV, parking, storage facility); taxes & professional svc (inc tax; CPA, bookkeeper, atty); household maint (maint & taxes for Indiana, Las Vegas & Calabasas); add'l items not previously reflected (family gatherings, parties, personal prop ins, vehicle reg & ins).


    [Review of imaged filed: 8/03/09 order provided for allowance NTE six months w/stat hrg set for 1/11/10; 1/11/10 M.O. provided cousel to give ntc of proposed action re adjustment to family allowance and, if no objection, petnrs may proceed w/their authority to adjust the allowance. Thereafter, stat hrg cont'd to 9/22/10 & 10/7/10, when it was taken off calendar.]


    MATTERS TO CLEAR: none


    RELIEF:
    1. JD allow and authorize the petnrs to pay a family allowance for the benefit of the Minor Children and for the benefit of Mrs. Jackson as set forth in the Petition.


    PA COMMENTS: See Motion to Seal at calendar #1003


    RELATED ITEMS: 1001-1005


    Order to be Prepared By Clerk: Attorney:


    ------------------------------------------------------


    BP117321 1003 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
    Letters of Administr
    MOTION - SEAL COURT RECORDS


    Petitioner(s): Jackson, Katherine Esther


    Attorney(s):


    Continuance Number: Continuance From:


    Last Date Changed: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 03:44 PM



    To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 429, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4 (b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney or Probate Examiner whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.
    RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:
    RELATED ITEMS: 1001-1005

  • Es gibt ein update: Kathrine hat einen Änderungsantrag ausgefüllt und erfragt nun die Kosten für das AEG-Berufungsverfahren unter Familienunterhalt , vorab war es unter Vormundschaft.. Gericht antwortet, dass es noch weiterhin zu klärende Fragen gibt und unter welchem Gesetzt der Estate für die Kosten verantworlich ist. Unter Familienunterhalt sei es nicht angemessen. Es stelle sich viel mehr die Frage ob es (of a petn for prelim dist) ich glaube das heißt vorgezogene Auszahlung aus dem Erbe ist und wenn das so ist muss geklärt werden ob diese eine angemessene Auszahlung aus den Fonds ist in Verantwortung auf die minderjährigen Kinder.


    Department LA 51 Court Convened at: 08:30 AM 07/24/2014
    Honorable
    , Deputy County Clerk , Deputy Sheriff
    , Reporter


    BP117321 1001 JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
    Letters of Administr
    ALLOWANCE OF FEES


    Petitioner(s): Jackson, Katherine Esther


    Attorney(s):


    Continuance Number: Continuance From:


    Last Date Changed: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:46 AM


    Last Note Changed By: DHORTON


    To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 429, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4 (b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney or Probate Examiner whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.


    petn filed 7/9/14


    SUMMARY:
    petnr is co-guardian
    ntc ok
    spcl ntc/copy (AG) ok
    supp filed 7/22/14


    FACTS: Petnr is co-guardian, seeking the court to instruct the Executors to pay atty fees incurred by petnr individually and as guardian. Petnr and the minor children are bens of this estate.


    On 9/15/10, petnr, individually and on behalf of the decd's 3 minor children, filed a wrongful death suit agst AEG Live (BC 445597). A verdict was entered in favor of AEG Live. On 1/22/14, petnr filed an appeal, retaining the firm of Reed Smith LLP to handle 2 consolidated appeals (B252411 and B251972)


    In April 2014, petnr and the minors were ordered to pay costs of 854,820.16 to AEG Live. On 5/27/14, Reed Smith filed Appellants' Opening Brief, Appendix, and the Certified Reporters' Transcripts. Reed Smith agreed to forego its typical hourly rate and agreed to a fee cap of 200,000 for the work on Appeal, plus a 100,000 success bonus if a reversal of the judgment was attained. There is an additional amt of 9,500 for costs. Petnr will provide a copy of the retainer agreement for in camera review. Atty rates are 340/hr - 830/hr.


    Pursuant to PC 2642(b) & (c), petnr requests that the court instruct the Executors to pay Reed Smith a maximum of 300,000 from the Estate, for legal services relating to the Appeal on behalf of petnr and the minor children, plus costs 9,500.


    Per decl of appellate atty, issues raised on appeal are numerous and complex, as the appeal challenges the trial cout's summary adjudication rulings and certain rulings during trial. Atty has reviewed trial court file, inc 17,700 page reporter's transcript, extensive legal research, prep and filing of opening brief and 16 volume appendix. A Reply brief will be due 50 days after the Respondent's Brief is filed.


    Fees will be paid as incurred, up to 200,000. Bills will be reviewed by atty and her counsel for accuracy.


    MATTERS TO CLEAR:
    b. Under what authority is this estate liable for the atty fees of petnr, individually, and as guardian of the minors? Is petnr actually seeking a preliminary dist to beneficiaries pay atty fees? If so, in what proportion should this amount be charged to the share of each beneficiary? are all equal benes? supp reqd. (per supp, petnr cites auth under PC 6540- Family Allowance)
    E. No copy of retainer agreement - petnr alleg it will be provided for in camera review. o/w, if court will not allow in camera review, to be filed w/ supp.



    RELIEF:
    1. JTD instruct and order the executors of the Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson, to pay counsel for the benes, Reed Smith LLP's attorney fees and costs not to exceed the sum of 300,000, for legal services rendered w/ respect to the Appeal, as well as related costs NTE 9,500 -


    P/A COMMENT: see notes. What authority for this estate to pay the attorney fees incurred on behalf of the beneficiaries individually? Petnr first claimed to be proceeding under PC 2642 (b) & (c) (atty fees in guardianship proceedings). Per supp, petnr now claims to be proceeding under PC 6540 (Family Allowance). However, PC 6540 applies to costs of maintenance of the family, and does not appear to be applicable her, for this cost. This appears to be more of a petn for prelim dist, which if the case, appearss must be brought first in the guardianship proceeding to determine if this is a proper expenditure of funds due to the minors. O/w, if this is really some sort of petition for instructions that petnr has authority for, then court may consider in camera review of retainer agreement. o/w, copy of retainer agreement to be filed w/ supp.

  • Ein aktueller Artikel, der sich mit der derzeitigen Absegnung des 3. Buchhaltungsberichtes des Estates vom Nachlassgericht befasst. Aktuell wurden vom Gericht die die aufgeführten Rechtskosten genehmigt.


    Die Rechstkosten des Estates im Jahre 2013 beliefen sich auf 1,9 Mio. Den größte Bazzen ging hierbei an die Firma Katten Muchin, die 1,1 Mio. erhält, davon alleine $917,919 für die Vertretung im fortlaufenden Rechtsfall mit Tohme. Katten hat den Estate zudem erfolgreich bzgl. Copyrightverletzungen von Michaeljacksonsecretvault.com vertreten und erfolgreich bei Schiedsgerichtverhandlungen von Creditor-Klagen in Höhe von 6,7 Mio. gegen den Estate. Die weiteren Rechskosten gehen an andere Rechtsfirmen und beziehen sich auf Steuerberatung, Verhanldungskosten zu den -Cirque-Shows und brokering-Deals zu diversen Tribute-Shows in verschiedenen Ländern.
    Am Dienstag, sagte Richter Beckloff die Mutter des Popstars, Katherine Jackson ließ eine forensische Buchhalterüberprüfung über die Rechttskosten der Gerichtskanzleien machen ", und der Buchhalter", war zufrieden."
    Den Part zur Tohme-Klage habe ich bereits im Tohme-Thread ausführlicher übersetzt.


    Estate verklagt Tohme Tohme



    Jackson Estate Pays $2M To Katten, Venable, Others
    Share us on: By Daniel Siegal


    Law360, Los Angeles (August 12, 2014, 5:36 PM ET) -- A California judge on Tuesday approved Michael Jackson's estate's disbursement of nearly $2 million to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Venable LLP and other firms for legal work in 2013, including suing a website for stealing Jackson's intellectual property and negotiating a Cirque du Soleil show based on Jackson's music.


    During a hearing on the estate's executors petition for settlement of the estate's third account current, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff said he would approve the fee requests for Katten Muchin, Venable, Greines Martin Stein & Richland LL, Arnold & Porter LLP and Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez PC, which totaled roughly $1.9 million for work done from Jan. 1, 2013, to Oct. 31, 2013.


    The largest fee request is Katten Muchin's, which will receive more than $1.1 million. The lion's share of that work is the estate's ongoing litigation to void agreements Jackson's former manager, Tohme R. Tohme, obtained before the pop star's death, which accounted for $917,919 of the total fees.


    That suit, filed in February 2012, alleged Tohme persuaded Jackson to sign a series of deals that guaranteed compensation and rights far beyond the norm of a personal manager. Jackson's executors John Branca and John McClain asked the court to declare these agreements void and to force Tohme to account for the money and property that he took from Jackson when he was the pop icon's personal manager from early 2008 until a few months before Jackson's June 25, 2009, death.


    Among these agreements was a document guaranteeing Tohme a fee of $35,000 per month plus expenses, according to the suit. In addition, the deal provided Tohme with 15 percent of all gross compensation received by Jackson for his services in the entertainment industry, including live performances, merchandising and recorded as well as live telecasts, the suit said.


    Katten also represented the estate in its litigation against website Michaeljacksonsecretvault.com, which was using a host of Jackson's intellectual property assets, including copyrights and trademarks, and in it successful defense in arbitration of a creditor's claim for $6.7M against the estate.


    Venable, meanwhile, requested $87,165 for its work as lead counsel in the estate's negotiations with Cirque du Soleil to develop and perform a show based on Jackson's life and music. Venable also represented the estate in general corporate matters and tax planning, to the tune of roughly $176,000.


    Arnold & Porter represented the estate in brokering deals for several tribute shows, including “Thriller Live!” which toured Europe and is shown in London, the “Forever King of Pop” show in Spain, and the “This Is It” show in Brazil, as well as in suing the organizers of an unauthorized tribute show in England. The firm requested roughly £173,000 ($291,000).


    Hochman Salkin requested $163,328 for legal services relating to the estate's tax return rendered for the period from Oct. 25, 2012, to Oct. 31, 2013.


    On Tuesday, Judge Beckloff said the pop star's mother, Katherine Esther Jackson had a forensic accountant look at the law firms' accounting, and the accountant, “was satisfied.”



    The estate is represented by Howard Weitzman of Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert LLP, Zia F. Modabber of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP and Jeryll S. Cohen of Hoffman Sabban & Watenmaker APC.


    Jackson's minor children are represented by guardian ad litem Margaret G. Lodise of Sacks Glazier Franklin & Lodise LLP.


    Katherine Esther Jackson is represented by Sandra L. Ribera of Ribera Law Firm APC and Perry R. Sanders Jr. of Sanders Law Firm LLC.


    The case is In the Matter of the Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson, case number BP117321 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles.


    --Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Chris Yates.


    http://www.law360.com/articles…-to-katten-venable-others

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von LenaLena ()

  • 4. Estate-Management-Bericht liegt vor.


    Summary of MJ Estate Fourth Accounting
    Die Zusammenfassung für den 4. Bericht habe ich von Ivy übernommen und übersetzt.


    Vierte Abrechnungszeitraum erstreckt sich vom 1. Januar 2013 bis 31. Dezember 2013 (erster Geschäftsbericht deckte Juni 2009 bis Oktober 2010, zweiter Abrechnungsbericht November 2010 bis Dezember 2011 und der dritte Bericht t Januar bis Dezember 2012).


    Vom 3. Bericht wussten wir dass MIJAC-Schulden voll bezahlt sind. Kein Besitz wurde in der 4. Berichtsperiode verkauft.


    Estate ist nicht in Postition geschlossen zu werden. Verlängerung um ein weiteres Jahr wird beantragt.


    Inventar, Vermögenswerte und Geschäftsaktivitäten sind die gleichen wie bei den vorherigen Rechnungslegungsunterlagen. Es gibt noch mehrere Nachlassansprüche gegen den laufenden Estate. Steuerstreit mit IRS ist eine andere juristische Materie, die der Estate noch zu lösen hat.

    Schedule D zeigt das Netteinkommen aus Gewerbebetrieb während des dritten Abrechnungszeitraum (Jan 2013- Dezember 2013) bei 40.333.827 $. (Bruttoeinkommen ist $ 67.407.156).


    Zahlungen an Katherine und MJs Kinder sind wie folgt (Januar 2013 - Dezember 2013)


    Kindergeld $ 4.347.020
    Katherines Unterhalt $ 1.200.477
    Calabasas Aufenthaltskosten $ 455.263
    Sonstige Aufwendungen 51.411 $
    Versicherung (für Gesundheit und Eigentum) $ 125.147
    Gehalt für Hausangestellte 471.469 $
    KJ & TJ Vormundschaftsanwaltskosten $ 247.482
    Gebührend für die Vormundsanwältin der Kinder $ 72.973
    Dienstprogramme $ 38.814
    Sicherheitskosten $ 369.468
    Reparatur & Wartung $ 809.767
    (Neu hinzu gekommen zum vierten Rechnungslegungs TJ Jackson Vormundschaftskosten $ 154.071


    Insgesamt $ 8.151.308 (eine Fußnote Listen insgesamt als $ 7.838.988. Siehe und bei Details)


    Hinweis: Estate bestätigt, dass sie von Zeit zu Zeit die Unterhaltszahlung für die Kinder und Kathrine erhöhen. Kindergeld zeigt eine steigende Tendenz. Die vierte Rechnungslegungs zeigte eine jährliche Vergütung 4.347.020 $. im Vergleich der Bericht $ 3.064.009 und der 2. Abrechnungszeitraum $ 2.139.194.


    Estate bezahlt $ 10.004.148 in Form von Steuern und Lizenzen. Estates Gerichtskosten für das Jahr 2013 betragen mehr als $ 4,5 Millionen.


    Immobilien bezahlt $ 170,609 für Gutachten. Estate hat $ 12.176 für den laufenden Archivierungsprojekt bezahlt. Sie zahlten $ 789.142 für die Lagerung von Michaels Eigentum.Estate Mitarbeiter wurden $ 47.494 gezahtl.. Estate bezahlte $ 769,155 für die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit.


    Estate bezahlt mehreren Beraterkosten. Sie zahlten $ 1.300.000 Beratungshonorar an Katherine Jackson (für Perry Sanders und ursprünglich $ 1,5 Millionen, aber um $ 200.000 reduziert für Rückzahlung ihres bisherigen Darlehen (mehr als $ 6,5 wurden an Katherine Jackson gegeben). Estate zahlt auch 6033 $ pro Monat an Jackie Jackson als Berater.


    Estate hat 16.500.000 $ Darlehensraten zurückgezahlt. Da Mijac Schulden in voller Höhe im dritten Buchhaltungszeitraum bezahlt wurden ging dieses Geldes Sony / ATV Schulden zur Schuldenbgeleichung. Ab Dezember 2013 hatte Estate 25.643.060 $ als Cash oder Äquivalente.


    Estate hat $2,294,737 aus Roylites verdient.


    Die totalen Ausgaben für die Co-Verwalter und Kreativdirektorausgaben betragen $3,838,790. Das ist weniger als im 3. Bericht $4,454,011.



    Kleinigkeiten:
    Für $ 141.825 Estate hat der ein Flugzeug gechartert für die Familien für die MJ One -Teilnahme.
    Estate zahlte für Ford F150 Raptor $ 64.424 für Prince .
    Estate hatte ein $ 10.000 Honorar an WebSheriff bezahlt.
    Estate hat $ 37.776 für die Domänensuche und Jahresgebühren gezahlt..
    Estate hat $ 314.320 an Sachverständiger- Gebühren für Arthur Erk von Citrin Copperman bezahlt. Erk hat als Sachverständiger für Katherine Jackson während des AEG-Prozesses ausgesagt und hatte ausgesagt, das MJ $ 1,5 Milliarden von TII verdient haben könnte. Erks Gebühr wird unter Familienbeihilfe angegeben, daher die 2 verschiedenen Zahlen ($ 8.151.308 Gesamtzahl gegenüber dem $ 7.838.988. Der Unterschied scheint die Zeugenexperten- Gebühr von Erks zu sein).


    Link zum vollen Dokument:
    http://de.scribd.com/doc/270231894/Mj-Estate-4th-Accounting


    http://dailymichael.com/the-es…counting-document-summary




  • Ah ja.... Peanuts! Hm..... einen Ford F150 Raptor für 64.424 $ .... ein "Kleinwagen" :doppelv:


  • :lulu:
    Kann man denn von dem bisschen Geld leben ? :klapper:



    Ja, nach dem heutigen Kurs wären es man ja nur.....


    Währungsrechner Dollar - Euro
    Schlusskurs: 0,9021 Eröffnung: 0,9044
    Tagestief: 0,8992 Tageshoch: 0,9064
    Kursdatum: 02.07.2015 Wochentag: Donnerstag
    1.200.477 Dollar = 1.082.974,3112 Euro


    1082974,3112 : 12 Mon. = schlappe 90.247,85 €/Mon.

  • :dd: Hmm...ich würd' mal sagen, es kommt drauf an, ob man "nur" sich selbst von dem Geld versorgen muss, oder ob man wie in Katherine's Fall noch die 50+ "Kinder" mit durchbringen "muss" :bored:


    Na ja, ein paar von denen verdienen ja auch selbst.... kommt jedoch auf den Lebensstil so mancher an... und bei der jüngeren Generation, wer da alles Sänger/Model ist... ich habe bisher von denen nix gesehen/gehört..... :schulter:

  • schlappe 90.247,85 €/Mon.


    Ist ja mein Reden..... damit kommt man doch kaum über die Runden.... :zahn:
    Nur gut, dass kein neueres Testament gefunden.... äh.... gemacht wurde.... :flöt:


    :dd: Hmm...ich würd' mal sagen, es kommt drauf an, ob man "nur" sich selbst von dem Geld versorgen muss, oder ob man wie in Katherine's Fall noch die 50+ "Kinder" mit durchbringen "muss" :bored:


    Du hast den Göttergatten vergessen :grins2:

    :herz::herz: "Wer für etwas kämpft, kann verlieren. Wer nicht kämpft, hat schon verloren." :herz::herz:

  • Ich frage mich gar nicht mal so sehr was Kathrine mit ihrem Geld macht oder wohin sie es verteilt. Was ich mich frage was mit den Vergütungen für die Kinder ist. Die 3 Kinder erhielten von November 2010 bis Dezember 2013 mehr als 9,5 Mio. Euro. Mehr als 3 Mio. für jeden in einem Zeitraum von 3 Jahren. Da alle Kinder in dem Zeitraum noch minderjährig waren, war es unter Verwaltung der Vormunde. Wäre intressant zu wissen wie viel Sparvermögen daraus denn noch für die Kinder vorhanden ist.



    Edit: Wie lautete noch der Satz von Latoya zu Zeiten (2011) des organiseriten Wales-Tributes wo Kathrine auf der PK für Michaels bedürftige Kinder eine Spende von 100000 Dollar entgegennahm.


    "Kathrine und Michaels Kinder haben nichts"

  • "Kathrine und Michaels Kinder haben nichts"


    :iwds: ... dieses "Nichts" .....

    Ich aber gelobte mir,
    mich niemals abstumpfen zu lassen
    und den Vorwurf der Sentimentalität
    niemals zu fürchten.

    Albert Schweitzer